{"id":3505,"date":"2012-12-20T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2012-12-20T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/new-report-assessment-of-wetland-condition-on-the-rio-grande-national-forest\/"},"modified":"2023-02-08T13:39:46","modified_gmt":"2023-02-08T20:39:46","slug":"new-report-assessment-of-wetland-condition-on-the-rio-grande-national-forest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/2012\/12\/20\/new-report-assessment-of-wetland-condition-on-the-rio-grande-national-forest\/","title":{"rendered":"New Report: Assessment of Wetland Condition on the Rio Grande National Forest"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div>\nCNHP Wetland Ecologist Joanna Lemly recently completed work<br \/>\non a project to characterize and assess the condition of wetlands on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fs.usda.gov\/riogrande\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">RioGrande National Forest<\/a> (RGNF) in south central Colorado. The project was<br \/>\ncarried out in conjunction with CNHP\u2019s first river basin scale wetland<br \/>\nassessment in the Rio Grande Headwaters River Basin. <\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<table align=\"center\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6216\" src=\"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_RGNF_C.jpg\" width=\"400\" height=\"301\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_RGNF_C.jpg 400w, https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_RGNF_C-300x226.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\">\n<div>\nHeadwater wetlands in the Sangre de Cristo Mountains of the<br \/>\nRGNF.<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div>\nBetween 2008 and 2011, CNHP partnered with <a href=\"https:\/\/cpw.state.co.us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Colorado Parks and Wildlife<\/a> (CPW) on a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) funded<br \/>\neffort to map and assess the condition of wetlands throughout the Rio Grande<br \/>\nHeadwaters River Basin, which includes the RGNF. Existing paper maps of<br \/>\nwetlands created by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fws.gov\/wetlands\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">National WetlandInventory<\/a> (NWI) program were converted to digital data<br \/>\nby GIS Analysts at CPW. In<br \/>\naddition to the mapping, 137 wetlands were surveyed across the Rio Grande<br \/>\nHeadwaters basin using condition assessment methods developed at CNHP over the<br \/>\npast decade. Of the wetlands surveyed, 52 were located on the RGNF in 10<br \/>\ndifferent watersheds. To supplement the EPA-funded study, the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fs.usda.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">U.S. ForestService<\/a> (USFS) provided funding through a Challenge Cost Share Agreement for<br \/>\nadditional wetland sampling on the RGNF to develop more comprehensive<br \/>\ninformation about the types, abundances, distribution, and condition of the<br \/>\nForest\u2019s wetlands. Through the agreement, 25 additional wetlands on the RGNF<br \/>\nwere surveyed and all data from the RGNF were summarized.<\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<table cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6217\" src=\"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_fieldwork_C.jpg\" width=\"225\" height=\"299\" \/><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\">\n<div>\nField crew members sampling a fen wetlands on the RGNF.<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div>\n&nbsp;&nbsp;Based on digitized NWI mapping, we now know the following<br \/>\nfacts about wetlands on the RGNF:<\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">There are 42,862 acres of wetlands and water<br \/>\nbodies within the RGNF.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Lakes and rivers comprise 4,687 acres or 11%.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Wetlands and water bodies represents<br \/>\napproximately 2% of the total land area in the RGNF.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Slightly over half (55%) of NWI mapped acres are<br \/>\nfreshwater herbaceous wetlands.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Shrub wetlands make up another 30%.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">When broken down by hydrologic regime, saturated<br \/>\nwetlands are the most common, comprising 73% of NWI acres.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Within the RGNF, 82% of all lakes are mapped<br \/>\nwith a dammed\/impounded modifier, indicating that most lakes are reservoirs of<br \/>\none kind or another.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Beavers influence only 4% of all wetland acres,<br \/>\nbut 23% of ponds are mapped as beaver ponds and 6% of shrub wetlands are mapped<br \/>\nwith beaver influence.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">65% of all NWI acres occur in the subalpine<br \/>\necoregions, which make up roughly the same proportion of the Forest\u2019s land<br \/>\narea.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Another 29% of NWI acres occur in the alpine<br \/>\nzone. Lower elevation zones contain very few wetland acres.<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -24px\">\n<\/div>\n<table align=\"center\" cellpadding=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" style=\"margin-left: auto;margin-right: auto;text-align: center\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6218\" src=\"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_downcutting_C.jpg\" width=\"309\" height=\"232\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_downcutting_C.jpg 309w, https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/12\/2018\/11\/wetland_downcutting_C-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 309px) 100vw, 309px\" \/><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: center\">\n<div>\nDown cutting of a small stream observed near a wetland in<br \/>\nthe Rio de los Pinos watershed of the RGNF.<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div>\n<br \/>Field surveys resulted in additional information about RGNF<br \/>\nwetlands.<\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">In total, 77 wetland sites were surveyed across<br \/>\nthe RGNF, including 30 riparian shrublands, 27 wet meadows, 17 fens, two<br \/>\nriparian woodlands, and one marsh.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Nearly 500 plant taxa were encountered during<br \/>\nthe surveys, including 445 identified to the species level.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Of the 445 identified to species level, 420<br \/>\n(94%) were native species and 25 were non-native species.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Noxious weeds, an aggressive subset of<br \/>\nnon-natives, were present in only four plots.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Wetland condition measures indicate that<br \/>\nwetlands on the RGNF are in excellent to good condition.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Floristic quality assessment indices were high<br \/>\nfor most wetlands, though did vary by both elevation and wetland type.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">Multi-metric Ecological Integrity Assessment<br \/>\n(EIA) scores rated most wetlands with an A- or B-rank, indicating that wetlands<br \/>\nwere either in reference condition or deviated only slightly from reference<br \/>\ncondition.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: Symbol;text-indent: -0.25in\">\u00b7<span style=\"font-family: 'Times New Roman';font-size: 7pt\">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/>\n<\/span><\/span><span style=\"text-indent: -0.25in\">A handful of wetlands received C-ranks, due to<br \/>\nstressors including grazing, hydrologic modifications, and surrounding land<br \/>\nuse.<\/span><\/div>\n<div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -24px\">\n<\/div>\n<p><!--[if !supportLists]--><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div style=\"text-indent: -.25in\">\n<\/div>\n<div>\n&nbsp;In conclusion, the RGNF contains thousands of acres of high<br \/>\nquality wetlands that provide essential services to the Forest and lands<br \/>\ndownstream. This study, in conjunction with others carried out by CNHP over the<br \/>\npast two decades, provides the RGNF with detailed information on specific<br \/>\nwetlands throughout the RGNF along with generalize conclusion on the extent,<br \/>\ndistribution, and condition of wetlands. This information can be used for a<br \/>\nvariety of management purposes.\u2003<\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CNHP Wetland Ecologist Joanna Lemly recently completed work on a project to characterize and assess the condition of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":6216,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3,22,32,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3505","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-ecology","category-friends-and-partners","category-national-forest","category-wetlands","entry","override"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3505\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6216"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cnhp.colostate.edu\/cnhpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}